The reason, says Carlos
Jiménez Ruiz, of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery and
co-author of the study, is that in a manufactured cigarette the paper compacts
the tobacco, while roll-ups need more paper. Thus, more CO is produced.
“Addicts smoking roll-ups tend to take more puffs and breathe the smoke more
deeply, possibly to compensate for smoking fewer cigarettes,” says Jimenez. The
result is that not only is more CO absorbed into the system but also a higher
level of cotinine (the substance contained in nicotine that remains in the
blood system one or two hours longer than nicotine itself), which is not
markedly different to that of smokers of manufactured cigarettes, as might be
expected given lower consumption rates.
A 2011 report (by the National
Institute of Consumers) report concludes that rolls are more dangerous than
ordinary smokes, not only because of the amount of carbon monoxide absorbed but
also because of an increase in nicotine dependency. Roll-up smokers are very
rarely aware of the amount of nicotine and tar they are taking in as only 33%
of rolling tobacco brands gives such details, and none of them mention carbon
monoxide. The European Directive on Tobacco, (the EU is waiting for Spain
to make it law). Curiously (or maybe not), in its Article 13, Clause 1a, the
directive expressly forbids including this information as “it induces error, as
it induces consumers to believe that some cigarettes are less harmful than
others.”
(Original article: El PaÍs online, 19/09/14)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to comment. Please make it as short as possible so we can deal with all of them. Your comment is subject to editing. Please do not use foul language. WE DO NOT USUALLY PUBLISH ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.